USPS Homepage Skip Navigation USPS Home | Postal Explorer Home
  Go to HTML Version >
     
  CALCULATORS/TOOLS:
  Postage Prices:
    Domestic
      Retail
      Business
    International
      Retail
      Business
  APO/FPO/DPO
  Restrictions
  Conversion Calculator
  Country Max Limits and
  Price Groups
  Customs Forms Indicator
  Service Standards
  Zone Charts
     
  July 2014 Price Change Information
     
    Draft July 2014
Postage Statements
Updated 04/17/2014
     
    Postage Stmnt Updates
Updated 04/17/2014
     
  Address Quality
  Business Customer
  Gateway
  Business Mail 101
  CASS
  Federal Register Notices
  Locate a Post Office
  Mailpiece Design
  Merlin
  PAVE
  PCSC
  Postage Statements
  Postal Bulletins
  Postal Links
  RIBBS
  Standard Mail Eligibility
  Decision Tree & CSRs
  ZIP Code Lookup
     
  About Postal Explorer
  Contact Us
  Download Acrobat Reader

 

 

October 22

October 22, 2010

 

The press release included below was issued this morning.

 

Postal Service Appeals PRC Decision on Exigent Price Request

Petition to be Filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals

 

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Postal Service today announced its decision to appeal the Sept. 30 ruling of the Postal Regulatory Commission denying the Postal Service exigent price request.

 

The Postal Service Governors' decision means that a petition will be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, seeking a review of the PRC’s interpretation of the law that governs how prices can be set under extraordinary and exceptional circumstances.

 

The Postal Service position is that the PRC misread the statute and applied an incorrect standard in evaluating the request for an exigent price increase.

 

“We have a fundamental disagreement with the PRC’s interpretation of the law,” said Postmaster General John E. Potter. “This action is an investment in our future. We need to understand and define the rules under the current law should the Postal Service find itself in a similar situation in the future.”

 

The Postal Service also asks the Court of Appeals to confirm the Postal Service right to pursue the exigent price increase as originally requested of the PRC.

 

It is expected that the Court of Appeals will ask for briefs from both the Postal Service and the PRC. Oral arguments also may be scheduled by the court once the petition challenging the PRC ruling is filed.

 

The Postal Service continues to evaluate other options to address the PRC’s ruling. The exigent price request would have generated about $2.3 billion in much needed revenue for the first nine months of calendar year 2011.

 

Filing for an exigent price change was the one tool the Postal Service had to use within the confines of the law to help address the impact the recession had on the its financial situation. But pricing is only one of a suite of solutions to address the dire financial situation the Postal Service faces. The long-term financial viability of the Postal Service will remain questionable unless the March 2 action plan is fulfilled.

 

A quick and timely resolution of the appeal is an important part of the Postal Service plan.

 

The Postal Service receives no tax dollars for operating expenses, and relies on the sale of products and services to fund its operations.